Hey there! So you're curious about what's actually going on with this site? Perfect. Let me walk you through everything I've built here... and more importantly, why it matters for FusionAuth documentation.
Look, I could've thrown together a basic portfolio. But that's not what FusionAuth needs, is it?
The homepage isn't just a landing page - it's a demonstration of modern web development practices. Dark mode by default (because we're developers, and we know what we like), with those subtle gradient animations that... well, they just feel right.
But here's the thing - every design choice has a purpose. The progressive disclosure of information? That's intentional. Users shouldn't be overwhelmed when they first land. They need a clear path forward.
You know what's interesting? I've structured this portfolio exactly how I'd structure FusionAuth's documentation. Start with the "why" (the hero section), move to the "what" (overview cards), then dive into the "how" (detailed projects).
And those animated cards that lift on hover? They're not just eye candy. They create a sense of interactivity that keeps users engaged. Same principle I'd apply to interactive documentation - make it feel alive.
Alright, this is where things get real. These aren't just writing samples...
This one's my favorite. Why? Because migration guides are where technical writers either shine or completely lose their audience. You're dealing with stressed-out developers who need to move their entire auth system. No pressure, right?
So I structured it differently. Instead of the typical "Step 1, Step 2" approach, I start with the outcome - what they'll gain from migrating. Then I address the elephant in the room: "Yes, this is going to be work, but here's exactly how much and why it's worth it."
Here's something most documentation gets wrong - they assume everyone knows what WebAuthn is. They don't. Even experienced developers might not be up to speed on passkeys yet.
So I wrote this guide like I'm explaining it to a smart friend who just hasn't encountered this tech yet. Start with the "why should I care?" (passwordless future), then the "what is this?" (brief technical overview), and only then dive into implementation.
This is the deep end of the pool. Air-gapped environments are... special. And by special, I mean "everything that could go wrong, will go wrong."
The guide acknowledges this reality. Instead of pretending it's straightforward, I layout the challenges upfront, then provide battle-tested solutions. Because developers in air-gapped environments don't have Stack Overflow to save them.
Documentation without working code is like a recipe without measurements... technically possible, but why make life harder?
The example-apps/node-quickstart
isn't just another Express app.
It's a production-ready template that developers can actually use. Real error handling,
proper session management, CSRF protection... the works.
But here's what makes it special - the code is heavily commented. Not with obvious stuff like
// This is a variable
, but with the why behind each decision.
Why PKCE? Why this particular session configuration?
The React example... this is where I show off a bit. It's not just "here's how to add a login button." It's a complete authentication system with protected routes, role-based access, automatic token refresh...
And yes, it's using hooks properly. No weird anti-patterns that'll make senior developers cringe. The kind of code you could drop into a real project and it would just... work.
This is where I put on my product manager hat...
Look, I get it. "Documentation modernization" sounds like corporate speak. But here's what it actually means - making docs that developers want to read.
The roadmap I've laid out isn't just "make things prettier." It's a systematic approach to reducing friction at every step of the developer journey. From discovery ("Can FusionAuth do X?") to implementation ("How do I do X?") to troubleshooting ("Why isn't X working?").
You want to know what really sets this apart? I've included a section on what NOT to do. Because sometimes knowing what to avoid is just as valuable as knowing what to build.
Things like: Don't implement AI search before fixing your information architecture. Don't add interactive tutorials if your basic getting-started guide is confusing. Common sense? Maybe. But you'd be surprised how often this gets ignored.
Okay, this is where things get exciting...
Traditional search is dead. Well, not dead, but it's definitely on life support. Users don't want to hunt through 50 search results to find their answer. They want to ask a question and get THE answer.
That's what the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) demo does. It's not just another chatbot that hallucinates answers. It's grounded in your actual documentation, providing accurate, contextual responses with source citations.
Built with Python, ChromaDB for vector storage, and OpenAI for generation. But here's the clever bit - it's not just dumping all your docs into a vector database.
The system uses semantic chunking (breaking documents at logical boundaries, not arbitrary character counts), metadata enrichment (version numbers, last updated, relevance scores), and a feedback loop to continuously improve responses.
Let me connect the dots for you...
Every example, every guide, every line of code shows that I don't just know about FusionAuth - I know how to implement it, optimize it, and explain it. The migration guides aren't theoretical; they're based on real architectural understanding.
When I write about JWT token validation, I'm not just copying from the docs. I understand the security implications, the performance considerations, the edge cases that'll bite you at 3 AM on a Sunday.
This whole portfolio is built with developer empathy at its core. Dark mode by default? That's empathy. Code examples that actually run? Empathy. Acknowledging that migrations are painful but providing clear paths forward? You guessed it...
Because great documentation isn't about showing how smart you are. It's about making your users feel smart. It's about removing friction, reducing cognitive load, and getting developers to that "aha!" moment as quickly as possible.
The roadmaps and ROI calculations show I'm not just a technical writer - I understand the business side too. Documentation isn't a cost center; it's a growth driver. Reduce support tickets, increase conversion rates, accelerate adoption...
Every recommendation is tied to measurable business outcomes. Because at the end of the day, that's what matters to leadership. Not how pretty the docs are, but how much value they deliver.
This portfolio isn't just showing that I can write about FusionAuth. It's demonstrating that I can transform how developers experience FusionAuth. From their first Google search to their production deployment, I'm thinking about every touchpoint, every potential frustration, every opportunity to delight.
That's not just technical writing. That's developer experience engineering. And that's exactly what FusionAuth needs to dominate the auth space.
If you've made it this far, you're probably serious about documentation. Good.
This entire site is version controlled, continuously deployed, and built with the same tools and processes I'd use for production documentation. Because your portfolio should demonstrate not just what you can create, but how you create it.
Every commit message is meaningful. Every file is organized logically. The code is clean, commented, and ready for collaboration. Because that's how I work, and that's what you'd get if we work together.
So... ready to revolutionize FusionAuth's documentation? Let's talk.
Get In Touch →